Police officers and detectives, in many cities, spend hours and hours on the Internet, pretending to be pre adolescent or adolescent girls, looking for adventure and new friends, in hopes of attracting males interested in young naive females, for sexual purposes.
We have seen the scenario on TV with the unaware sexual predator coming to the child’s home, in hopes of a sexual a encounter, only to be met by the camera crew from a major TV network, and the local police. This type of entrapment, is exactly that. Entrapment.
In a court of law does entrapment have enough weight to convict a person of a crime? Will the entrapped person be punished by a court of law, and are the police spending a disproportionate amount of time on Internet child predators, when most child predators are not on the Internet?
Do you want to know where they are?
Most pedephiles are often authothority figues known to the child, good friends of the parents, neighbors, relatives, siblings, or the parents themselves.
Then why don’t the police attempt to arrest those child predators, close to the child? Simple. It’s easier to trace pedephiles through a credit card number used to access child pornography sites on the Internet, than it is to approach a parent or relative of a child, who denies the sexual abuse, and often there may be no physical proof.
If the law enforcement in a city takes the easy and convinient way out, then there appears to be no interest in children’s sexual protection from abuse and exploitation. The sexual safety and protection of children is not real and appears to be only lip service.
Child sexual protection is selective, and the majority of children are not protected. Children are, by and large, ignored by the system, and this constitutes the real sexual abuse.